The filter uses speedMinutesTypical, one number per record: a reading of a sourced sentence about the ordinary case, reduced to something comparable across a column. It is not a service level agreement, not a measurement we took, and not a promise the operator made to you.
The reduction is partly mechanical, and you should know that before leaning on the column. A sourced sentence containing the word instant, immediate or seconds is recorded as 5, whatever else the sentence goes on to say. Three of the four numbers on this page were set that way, and only Metaspins' comes from a figure a source actually printed.
All four, with the sentence each number came from:
Bitcasino.io, automated withdrawals under 2 minutes with USDT on TRC-20 near-instant, recorded as 5 — slower than the two minutes in its own sentence, because near-instant is the phrase that set the number. Duelbits, near-instant for crypto on verified accounts and up to 24 hours overall including operator approval, recorded as 5 on the first half of that sentence; note where the second half ends. Metaspins, most crypto withdrawals in 10 to 20 minutes, recorded as 10, the bottom of its own range; read at the midpoint it would be 15 and Metaspins would not be here. Thunderpick, crypto withdrawals approved close to instantly with funds typically arriving within minutes, recorded as 5.
The spread across the four is five minutes, smaller than the uncertainty in any one reading. Treat them as indistinguishable on speed.
The same derivation is why Livecasino.io appears among the eleven that clear the speed bar. Its record holds no measured figure on purpose: the note on that field says the operator publishes only qualitative language, that the 15-minute figure circulating in reviews comes from a player comment rather than the operator, and that complaints on the same sites describe 35 to 48 hours. The word instantly in the operator's own claim produced a 5 regardless. Livecasino.io is excluded from this page on its record rather than on its speed, so the four here are unaffected — but it is the reason to read the sentence under a number rather than the number.
What the figure excludes. Verification, first. All four are recorded as risk-based KYC: nothing asked at sign-up and a request arriving later, usually at a withdrawal that is large relative to your deposits. Duelbits is the one to hold loosely — an earlier pass on that record classified it as verification required at withdrawal, current sources describe it as risk-triggered, and the record leaves the question open. Its record does say plainly that any fiat route, Visa, Mastercard or Interac, requires verification outright. The clock this page measures starts after all of that. It excludes the chain too. Approved is not arrived, and crypto casino withdrawals covers confirmations and the wrong-network mistake.
Where these figures come from. No official site among the four was readable from our research environment on 17 September 2026. Bitcasino.io and Metaspins failed DNS lookup. Duelbits returned HTTP 403 on an earlier pass and, on 17 September, a TLS certificate valid only for anj.fr — the domain of the Autorité Nationale des Jeux, the French regulator, whose blocking page the request had been redirected to. Thunderpick did not resolve through our DNS resolver, and its site returns HTTP 403 to automated requests in any case. Every figure here is secondary-sourced from review sites, three at medium confidence and Thunderpick's at low.
An operator with no published figure is excluded, not assumed slow. Seven of the twenty-seven published records carry no typical-minutes figure at all, and three of those, BC.Game, Shuffle and Winna, also carry a clean record. They are absent because there is nothing to compare, not because we think them slow.
